What network topology should you implement to accommodate failed connections in a wired infrastructure?

Implementing a mesh topology is highly effective for accommodating failed connections in a wired infrastructure due to its inherent design characteristics. In a mesh topology, each node (computer or device) is connected to multiple other nodes. This means that if one connection fails, data can still reach its destination through other available paths. This redundancy is crucial for maintaining network reliability and minimizing downtime, as users will not experience a complete loss of connectivity if a single cable or device fails.

Moreover, mesh topologies can be either fully meshed, where every node is connected to every other node, or partially meshed, where some nodes are interlinked. This flexibility allows network designers to balance resource allocation against redundancy, offering scalable solutions tailored to specific needs.

In contrast, options like star, ring, or bus topologies do not provide the same level of fault tolerance. For example, in a star topology, if the central hub fails, all devices lose connectivity. In a ring topology, a single broken connection can disrupt the entire network loop. Meanwhile, a bus topology relies on a single central cable for data transmission, meaning that if this cable fails, the entire network goes down. Therefore, a mesh topology stands out as the best choice for resilience in the face of connection failures